Current version of Distel

[Zachary Kessin-2]

I just tried to use DistEL with Erlang 20 and I got an error message about UTF-8 atoms. Is there a version of DistEL that has been updated for Erlang 20, or failing that a different emacs integration to use?

Zach

--

ᐧ

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

[Leo Liu-2]

On 2017-06-19 10:30 +0300, Zachary Kessin wrote:
> I just tried to use DistEL with Erlang 20 and I got an error message about
> UTF-8 atoms. Is there a version of DistEL that has been updated for Erlang
> 20, or failing that a different emacs integration to use?

Maybe your Erlang 20 is outdated?

Leo

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

[Richard Carlsson-3]

RabbitMQ also had problems with the change in atom encoding, and because of this, the final version of OTP 20 is going to keep backwards compatibility for atoms that only use the latin-1 range. So if you just wait for a new release candidate, the problem should go away (unless you want to actually use code points above 255 in atoms - then Distel needs to be updated).

2017-06-19 9:30 GMT+02:00 Zachary Kessin <[hidden email]>:

I just tried to use DistEL with Erlang 20 and I got an error message about UTF-8 atoms. Is there a version of DistEL that has been updated for Erlang 20, or failing that a different emacs integration to use?

Zach

--

ᐧ

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

[Richard Carlsson-3]

See https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-431 for more details.

2017-06-19 11:34 GMT+02:00 Richard Carlsson <[hidden email]>:

RabbitMQ also had problems with the change in atom encoding, and because of this, the final version of OTP 20 is going to keep backwards compatibility for atoms that only use the latin-1 range. So if you just wait for a new release candidate, the problem should go away (unless you want to actually use code points above 255 in atoms - then Distel needs to be updated).

2017-06-19 9:30 GMT+02:00 Zachary Kessin <[hidden email]>:

I just tried to use DistEL with Erlang 20 and I got an error message about UTF-8 atoms. Is there a version of DistEL that has been updated for Erlang 20, or failing that a different emacs integration to use?

Zach

--

ᐧ

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

[Kenneth Lundin-5]

The real OTP 20.0 is planned to be released on Wednesday and is changed the way Richard explained. I suppose you are using a release candidate. 

Regards Kenneth 

On Jun 19, 2017 11:34 AM, "Richard Carlsson" <[hidden email]> wrote:

RabbitMQ also had problems with the change in atom encoding, and because of this, the final version of OTP 20 is going to keep backwards compatibility for atoms that only use the latin-1 range. So if you just wait for a new release candidate, the problem should go away (unless you want to actually use code points above 255 in atoms - then Distel needs to be updated).

2017-06-19 9:30 GMT+02:00 Zachary Kessin <[hidden email]>:

I just tried to use DistEL with Erlang 20 and I got an error message about UTF-8 atoms. Is there a version of DistEL that has been updated for Erlang 20, or failing that a different emacs integration to use?

Zach

--

ᐧ

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

[Zachary Kessin-2]

Yes I have a RC release, so if it will be fixed later this week I will just not worry about it for a few days

Zach

ᐧ

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Kenneth Lundin <[hidden email]> wrote:

The real OTP 20.0 is planned to be released on Wednesday and is changed the way Richard explained. I suppose you are using a release candidate. 

Regards Kenneth 

On Jun 19, 2017 11:34 AM, "Richard Carlsson" <[hidden email]> wrote:

RabbitMQ also had problems with the change in atom encoding, and because of this, the final version of OTP 20 is going to keep backwards compatibility for atoms that only use the latin-1 range. So if you just wait for a new release candidate, the problem should go away (unless you want to actually use code points above 255 in atoms - then Distel needs to be updated).

2017-06-19 9:30 GMT+02:00 Zachary Kessin <[hidden email]>:

I just tried to use DistEL with Erlang 20 and I got an error message about UTF-8 atoms. Is there a version of DistEL that has been updated for Erlang 20, or failing that a different emacs integration to use?

Zach

--

ᐧ

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

--

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

[Rickard Green-2]

I had a quick look at Distel. It communicates with an erlang node using the erlang distribution.

The only thing that has been changed regarding this between rc2 and now is term_to_binary(). Erlang distribution still requires utf8 atom support as of OTP-20.0. That is, distel needs to be updated in order to be able to communicate with OTP-20. 

Regards,

Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP

tis 20 juni 2017 kl. 09:01 skrev Zachary Kessin <[hidden email]>:

Yes I have a RC release, so if it will be fixed later this week I will just not worry about it for a few days

Zach

ᐧ

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Kenneth Lundin <[hidden email]> wrote:

The real OTP 20.0 is planned to be released on Wednesday and is changed the way Richard explained. I suppose you are using a release candidate. 

Regards Kenneth 

On Jun 19, 2017 11:34 AM, "Richard Carlsson" <[hidden email]> wrote:

RabbitMQ also had problems with the change in atom encoding, and because of this, the final version of OTP 20 is going to keep backwards compatibility for atoms that only use the latin-1 range. So if you just wait for a new release candidate, the problem should go away (unless you want to actually use code points above 255 in atoms - then Distel needs to be updated).

2017-06-19 9:30 GMT+02:00 Zachary Kessin <[hidden email]>:

I just tried to use DistEL with Erlang 20 and I got an error message about UTF-8 atoms. Is there a version of DistEL that has been updated for Erlang 20, or failing that a different emacs integration to use?

Zach

--

ᐧ

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

--

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

--

_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions