|
Hi List,
I would like to know if any of you are using or heard of using Erlang in an IP v6 environment. We are planning some server migrations to IP v6 and before we start the development of a prototype, I would like to know your comments please.
Regards, Kannan.
_______________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list [hidden email] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions |
|
We will be using the latest version of Erlang/OTP and Redhat Enterprise Linux. On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Kannan <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi List, _______________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list [hidden email] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions |
|
Hello!
What protocols (or applications) do you plan to use? We had issues with SNMP, SSL, CORBA, HTTP, FTP - I think SSH actually worked. Our issues have been fixed, but you'll probably need the development version of Erlang/OTP (or wait until OTP R14B04), because some of these fixes were made after R14B03 was released. 2011/8/5, Kannan <[hidden email]>: > We will be using the latest version of Erlang/OTP and Redhat Enterprise > Linux. > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Kannan <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi List, >> >> I would like to know if any of you are using or heard of using Erlang in >> an >> IP v6 environment. We are planning some server migrations to IP v6 and >> before we start the development of a prototype, I would like to know your >> comments please. >> >> Regards, >> Kannan. >> > erlang-questions mailing list [hidden email] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions |
|
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:22:47PM +0200, Attila Rajmund Nohl wrote:
> Hello! > > What protocols (or applications) do you plan to use? We had issues > with SNMP, SSL, CORBA, HTTP, FTP - I think SSH actually worked. Our > issues have been fixed, but you'll probably need the development > version of Erlang/OTP (or wait until OTP R14B04), because some of > these fixes were made after R14B03 was released. Distribution is a bit broken too (IPv6 node registration with epmd isn't enabled). After a small change to epmd, distribution over IPv6 worked ok for me. > 2011/8/5, Kannan <[hidden email]>: > > We will be using the latest version of Erlang/OTP and Redhat Enterprise > > Linux. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Kannan <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> Hi List, > >> > >> I would like to know if any of you are using or heard of using Erlang in > >> an > >> IP v6 environment. We are planning some server migrations to IP v6 and > >> before we start the development of a prototype, I would like to know your > >> comments please. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Kannan. > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > erlang-questions mailing list > [hidden email] > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions erlang-questions mailing list [hidden email] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions |
|
In reply to this post by Attila Rajmund Nohl
We are using protocols related to telecommunication signaling. Btw, if transport protocols fit in with network layer, there should not be any problems with application layer protocols, I guess. Almost all what you have mentioned are application layer protocols. I would like to know more about it form you guys. The first two mails themselves are discouraging, I would also like the advice from Erlang core developers.
Thanks. On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Attila Rajmund Nohl <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello! _______________________________________________ erlang-questions mailing list [hidden email] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions |
|
Hello!
From the top of my head: we couldn't register IPv6 agents into the SNMP manager, the API simly didn't handle IPv6 addresses (and the transport protocol). With HTTP a peername function didn't expect IPv6 addresses and crashed. I don't remember the other problems exactly, but ther were similar in caliber. With the source we could solve them - it was just annoying. 2011/8/5, Kannan <[hidden email]>: > We are using protocols related to telecommunication signaling. Btw, if > transport protocols fit in with network layer, there should not be any > problems with application layer protocols, I guess. > > Almost all what you have mentioned are application layer protocols. I would > like to know more about it form you guys. > > The first two mails themselves are discouraging, I would also like the > advice from Erlang core developers. > > Thanks. > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Attila Rajmund Nohl <[hidden email] >> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> What protocols (or applications) do you plan to use? We had issues >> with SNMP, SSL, CORBA, HTTP, FTP - I think SSH actually worked. Our >> issues have been fixed, but you'll probably need the development >> version of Erlang/OTP (or wait until OTP R14B04), because some of >> these fixes were made after R14B03 was released. >> >> 2011/8/5, Kannan <[hidden email]>: >> > We will be using the latest version of Erlang/OTP and Redhat Enterprise >> > Linux. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Kannan <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi List, >> >> >> >> I would like to know if any of you are using or heard of using Erlang >> >> in >> >> an >> >> IP v6 environment. We are planning some server migrations to IP v6 and >> >> before we start the development of a prototype, I would like to know >> your >> >> comments please. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Kannan. >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> erlang-questions mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions >> > erlang-questions mailing list [hidden email] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
