> Hello fellow erlangers!
> I have ported Erlang to MacOSX, quite easily, just hacking a bit in the
> configure scripts. I have no numbers on performance yet, but it seems
> reasonably fast. (My 266MHz G3 being on par with a 500MHz Pentium II
> windows machine.)
> I am also experimenting with the graphical interface. As you know, MacOSX
> doesn't use X-windows, instead it has a interface called Aqua, which is a
> newer version of NextStep. I have two ways to use GUI on MacOSX: a
> erl_interface-based module which can be used with the Interface Builder to
> create a Mac GUI to an Erlang program; and an attempt to port gs, that
> still has lots of work to be usable (i.e. good enough to run the debugger).
I'm not a greate fan of gs - it's to slow and feature poor if you want to do any
good UI (lacks gui widgets/components, drop & drag support) or animation (need
double buffering support to do this flicker free), I would like to something
Does such a thing exist ? and does it use code (e.g. java byte code) that
doesn't need to be recompiled for windows, mac, linux ....
I think MacOSX has tcl/tk, I know that there was a version on classic macos -
could that one be used or can etk use it, erlang seams to use it own (hacked ?)
version of tlc/tk.
Could one implement gs ontop of etk in that case.
I my personal hobby project currently uses a prototyp gs based gui, but I intend
to use java, esdl or some protable C(/C++ ...) based api.
I've toyed with the idea to create a 'extended' gs with more features - based on
some other graphis underpining than tk.
> Please let me know if anyone's interested, or willing to help.
I'll be happy to run this as my erlang platfrom at home and report/fix any
strange bugs I find.
> I'm planning to make an open source-release of OTP on MacOSX, after I've
> tested it with the released MacOSX.
"released MacOSX" does that mean the final (non beta) version to be released