Quantcast

Using bound variables in a fun's function clause

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Using bound variables in a fun's function clause

Vincent de Phily
Hi all,

consider the following snipnet :

> #!/usr/bin/escript
> main([Arg1, Arg2]) ->
>     F = fun(Arg1) -> match;                                                                                                                                                                
>            (_) -> nomatch                                                                                                                                                                    
>         end,                                                                                                                                                                                
>     io:format("~p~n", [F(Arg2)]).

Compiling this (R13B04) will complain about
./test/funbind.es:3: Warning: variable 'Arg1' is unused
./test/funbind.es:4: Warning: variable 'Arg1' is unused
./test/funbind.es:4: Warning: variable 'Arg1' shadowed in 'fun'
and create a fun where Arg1 is unbound.

If I change the implementation to :
>    F = fun(Arg1_tmp) when Arg1_tmp == Arg1 -> match;                                                                                                                                        
>           (_) -> nomatch                                                                                                                                                                      
>        end,                                                                                                                                                                                
or even :
>    F = fun(Foo) ->
>                case Foo of
>                    Arg1 -> match;
>                    _ -> nomatch  
>                end
>        end,
I'll get the behavior I want (creating the fun with Arg1 bound) without any
compile warning.


Is this the expected behaviour ? If so, what's the rationale ? It's easy to
work around, but it is quite surprising.

--
Vincent de Phily
Mobile Devices
+33 (0) 142 119 325
+353 (0) 85 710 6320

Warning
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of its
intended recipient and may contain information that is confidential, subject
to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
computer. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
[hidden email] and do not necessarily represent those of
the
company. Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility
for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.

________________________________________________________________
erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
To unsubscribe; mailto:[hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Using bound variables in a fun's function clause

Ahmed Omar
Hi Vincent,
Yes it's expected. It's about the variables scope
You can read more here:
http://www.erlang.org/doc/programming_examples/funs.html#id58554

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Vincent de Phily <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> consider the following snipnet :
>
> > #!/usr/bin/escript
> > main([Arg1, Arg2]) ->
> >     F = fun(Arg1) -> match;
> >            (_) -> nomatch
> >         end,
> >     io:format("~p~n", [F(Arg2)]).
>
> Compiling this (R13B04) will complain about
> ./test/funbind.es:3: Warning: variable 'Arg1' is unused
> ./test/funbind.es:4: Warning: variable 'Arg1' is unused
> ./test/funbind.es:4: Warning: variable 'Arg1' shadowed in 'fun'
> and create a fun where Arg1 is unbound.
>
> If I change the implementation to :
> >    F = fun(Arg1_tmp) when Arg1_tmp == Arg1 -> match;
> >           (_) -> nomatch
> >        end,
> or even :
> >    F = fun(Foo) ->
> >                case Foo of
> >                    Arg1 -> match;
> >                    _ -> nomatch
> >                end
> >        end,
> I'll get the behavior I want (creating the fun with Arg1 bound) without any
> compile warning.
>
>
> Is this the expected behaviour ? If so, what's the rationale ? It's easy to
> work around, but it is quite surprising.
>
> --
> Vincent de Phily
> Mobile Devices
> +33 (0) 142 119 325
> +353 (0) 85 710 6320
>
> Warning
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of its
> intended recipient and may contain information that is confidential,
> subject
> to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
> computer. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
> [hidden email] and do not necessarily represent those
> of
> the
> company. Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no
> viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility
> for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> To unsubscribe; mailto:[hidden email]
>
>


--
Best Regards,
- Ahmed Omar
http://nl.linkedin.com/in/adiaa
Follow me on twitter
@spawn_think <http://twitter.com/#!/spawn_think>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Using bound variables in a fun's function clause

Vincent de Phily
On Monday 18 October 2010 15:38:38 Ahmed Omar wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> Yes it's expected. It's about the variables scope
> You can read more here:
> http://www.erlang.org/doc/programming_examples/funs.html#id58554

Ah, I really should have done my homework better and RTFM (I'll blame
tiredness). Thanks for the quick reply.
--
Vincent de Phily
Mobile Devices
+33 (0) 142 119 325
+353 (0) 85 710 6320

Warning
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of its
intended recipient and may contain information that is confidential, subject
to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
computer. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
[hidden email] and do not necessarily represent those of
the
company. Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility
for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.

________________________________________________________________
erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
To unsubscribe; mailto:[hidden email]

Loading...