cover:analyze ambiguity

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

cover:analyze ambiguity

Roger Lipscombe-2
Any chance of a better API for cover:analyze that doesn't have all of
the ambiguity?

cover:analyse(M, module) gets tripped up if I have a module named
'coverage' or 'calls'. Similarly, there's a comment in there that
*hopes* that we don't have a module named 'html'.

Seems like an improved interface (keep the old one as well, obviously)
would be a good thing.
_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
[hidden email]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions