Presumably your rebar release is using interactive mode (your module
isn't loaded at startup) while your rebar3 release is using embedded
mode (your mode is loaded at startup).
On 10/11/18 12:06 PM, Caragea Silviu wrote:
> I have a project that compiles ok using both rebar and rebar3, also
> works ok with both If I start it from command line like:
> erl -pa _build/default/lib/*/ebin -config _build/configs/app.config
> But is not starting with a rebar3 release.
> I'm getting a crash like:
> Thu Oct 11 12:55:14 2018
> Slogan: Kernel pid terminated (application_controller)
> System version: Erlang/OTP 19 [erts-126.96.36.199] [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8]
> [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:true] [dtrace]
> Compiled: Sat Aug 11 23:57:43 2018
> The erlpool_globals code is :
> https://github.com/silviucpp/erlpool/blob/master/src/erlpool_globals.erl > . Basically it's just a stub module that's compiled dynamically and
> replace at runtime . I created this to avoid static code analyzer errors
> in IntelliJ.
> Also it's strange because if I change do_not_load() to return ok it's
> working :)
> Any hints ?
> erlang-questions mailing list
> [hidden email] > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions >